Stormbringer's Thunder

Now, I know that there are people who will go with redefinitions and a "No True Scientist" fallacy here, that true scientists accept evolutionism; anyone who rejects evolution must be an unedjamakated fundie. But that is obviously fallacious. It is also an attempt at poisoning the well and an appeal to ridicule. This short video will inform you of the truth.

Before you get your knickers in a twist about the use of the word "idiot" in the title, let me point out the historical setting. A "useful idiot" was a supporter of the Soviet Union in the West, and the Soviets  held them in contempt . They blindly followed fatally flawed ideology. Zack Kopplin is being used by atheistic evolutionism. Like Bill Nye, he is unclear on several concepts, including the difference between operational and historical science, the profound lack of importance of evolution to scientific development, and more. He has been deceived by fundamentalist atheist evolutionists and is adored by Richard Dawkins  and other proselytizers of atheism. The religious dogma of evolutionism cannot withstand scrutiny and it cannot tolerate competition. Many seek to punish doubters of evolution. (It must drive them batty that this date has been established as Question Evolution Day , huh?) Atheists and evolutionists are usually bigoted and intolerant of an

by Cowboy Bob Sorensen It must drive Michael Zimmerman and other misotheists around the bend that there are people who are not interested in his "Evolution Weekend" apostasy drive. F'rinstance, there are Bible-believing Christians who take a stand and proclaim " Creation Sunday " every year since 2006. There are also people involved in the grassroots " Question Evolution Day ", started by yours truly in 2012. It was inspired by the " Question Evolution! " campaign. One part of "Question Evolution Day" includes the use of the " 15 Questions for Evolutionists " presented by CMI . (I was honored that they liked my video and included it in their "15 Questions" page.) As I've said for a while now, hate stupidifies. (For the atheopath readers, that's stupid-i-fies, it makes people stupid.) Their emotions cloud their reasoning abilities. I am not a reader of the "Huffington Post", even t

To be a consistent atheist, you cannot follow where the evidence leads. At least, not if you see that the evidence shows evolution is not science and that there is a Creator. No, even though the Creator is the rational conclusion, emotion and blind hate keep the irrational atheist from getting there. Instead, they have to believe in some magical things that defy reason. Things that lead them to the magical fairyland of evolution, and seething, bitter hatred for Bible believers and for  Question Evolution Day, February 12 . Edit: For those who claim that evolution is not concerned with the origin of life, and that such a thing is not even taught, that is the opposite of the truth. Here is one example .

To be an atheist, you must believe in the impossible and discard reason. The atheist wordview is incoherent and irrational. They have no real foundation for morality except for what is expedient for them at the moment, al l they while saying they're "Good without God" . Perhaps that is why so many are angry, obstreperous, vituperative and just plain bitter. Perhaps that is why they hate Question Evolution Day . Perhaps that is why they hate Chr istians, because our worldview contains the necessary preconditions of hu man experience — ours makes sense.

Some atheopaths are amazed that I am not impressed by their dazzling intellects. After all, they bill themselves as the intellectual elite, as if merely declaring themselves to be atheists magically gives them superior minds. Then they subject us to pooling of ignorance sites like (empty) talk.origins and (ir) RationalWiki. Do not want. Especially the latter. It is a den of foolish excuses to disbelieve in God and hate the Bible, with lots and lots of libel and defamation. They are liars without standards. "Good without God"? oh, please! If they actually were rational and had standards instead of letting any loser write any libelous nonsense, they might actually be worthy of respect. Ain't happening, Zeke. Go have another drink. Here is an example. They libeled the PPSIMMONS ministry, showing themselves to be uninformed fools, as this video illustrates: If I was an atheist, I'd be embarrassed by the badly misnamed "RationalWiki". We're not

stock.xchng/schulergd  We're getting closer to " Question Evolution Day ", and this video raises some serious questions. Evolutionists hate the fact that DNA is highly-coded, complex information.  And rather a lot, really. Worse for them, this information is purposeful and directed. Efficiently. It is exchanged  within a cell. This means there was a Designer.